Apologetics: Questions About God

Click on the blue dot to read the response.

How can a loving God send people to hell?
Why don't miracles happen anymore? Has God "disappeared"?
Why does a loving God allow suffering to continue?
Are there sins which God cannot or will not forgive?
Can God create a rock so big that He cannot move it?
Where did God come from?
Why do so many people's prayers go unanswered? Didn't Jesus promise that God would do anything we ask?

How can a loving God send people to hell?

Response by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: Matthew 22:8-14

Pertinent text #2: Matthew 25:41-46

Pertinent text #3: Psalm 145:20

Pertinent text #4: John 3:18-19

Pertinent text #5: Revelation 7:9-12

It is my strong conviction that the only people who will, at the "end of the world", find themselves in "outer darkness" are those who choose to go. I will show this by showing that all of the (rather fear-provoking) passages quoted above that involve condemnation are speaking of the condemnation of those that rejected God, and knew who they were rejecting.

Let us begin with the man who did not have on his "wedding garment" in Matthew 22. I looked in my Vine's Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words under "garment", and this is what I found:

So we see that the man who was cast "into outer darkness" in that parable was not helpless and ignorant, but indeed had been given a wedding garment and simply did not wear it. The word "speechless" suggests to me that the man had no response to the king worthy of being spoken; he had no excuse.

It is the same way with the many people Jesus refers to in the parable. Those people spoken of in this parable who are cast into outer darkness have every opportunity to participate in the wedding of Christ (The Anointed One) and His Church. They respond either by not coming to the wedding at all or by half-hearted, reluctant compliance, as if they don't want to have a part in it anyway. This suggests that people like that don't really love Jesus; if they did, they would "wear their wedding garment".

Now let us consider the parable of the sheep and the goats (Matthew 25). The people in this parable who are cast into "everlasting fire" appear to be ignorant of the fact that they have neglected to administer compassionate aid to Jesus (v. 44). Considering this, it superficially appears cruel that God would condemn them for something they were ignorant of. There are, however, two very good justifications for this condemnation; the "goats" are not as innocent as might be construed.

First notice that the people who inherit the kingdom were ignorant of their ministry to Jesus as well (v. 37). They had no idea that their compassion for other people was considered to be compassion towards the Lord Jesus. Secondly, I bring to your attention some wisdom in I John 4:19-21:

So we see that the people who truly loved God were discerned by the fact that they brought their compassion for their fellow man into action; likewise, those who did not truly love God were discerned by the fact that they did not truly love their fellow man. And so, because they did not love God, they were cast into "everlasting fire".

Likewise in Psalm 145, we see that those who love God are "preserved", and the wicked (presumably, those who do not love God) are destroyed. Likewise in the third chapter of John, we see that condemnation does not come to people because of deeds or the whimsicality of a hateful God; condemnation comes because people do not love God. The people who get sent to hell (Gehenna in the Greek, used to refer to the "lake of fire" as in Revelation) are the people who have no love for Jesus. (notice that the wedding guests in Matthew 22 include people who are "good and bad")

And so the whole matter will be resolved when one last question is answered: Why is it the case that people who love God receive eternal life, and those who do not love God are sent into "outer darkness" / "everlasting fire"?

The answer is found in the Revelation as well as miscellaneous other places in the prophets. It seems to be a trend in all the prophetic descriptions of heaven that people worship God an awful lot. The angels are always giving praises, the saints are present worshipping God. If someone is in heaven, he is worshipping God! Who would willingly participate in such activity that did not love God? If someone did, their praise would be worthless; such empty worship has sickened the church for years and years. Considering what goes on in Heaven, I don't understand why someone who does not love Jesus would want to go there.

Given that the heartfelt worship of God is pretty much all that goes on in Heaven, it only makes sense to say that those who love Him are the only ones who would want to be there. And so it is very sensible to say that those who do not love Jesus condemn themselves, and so when the time comes they will be given what they want. Those who don't want to worship God will not be forced to; those who want to worship the God they love will not be denied that great privilege.

This is how a God that loves all people so very much could send people into outer darkness: they wanted to go.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Why don't miracles happen anymore? Has God "disappeared"?

Response by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: Joel 2:29-30

Pertinent text #2: Matthew 10:8

Pertinent text #3: John 14:12

Pertinent text #4: I Corinthians 12:29-13:3

Pertinent text #5: Luke 11:13

Pertinent text #6: I John 3:23-24

Pertinent text #7: James 4:2-3

(I assume here that the reader understands that when miracles are performed in Jesus' name, they are performed via the Holy Spirit.)

First of all, I disagree with the assumption that this question makes: that miracles do not happen in today's world. If the reader disagrees, I would recommend any biography of John G. Lake, a man who was extremely gifted by God's Spirit in the area of healing. He lived within the past 100 years. Lots of supernatural healing also goes on in the charismatic and pentecostal churches of America.

In case anyone wants some actual examples of supernatural phenomena, I have a couple:

I met a man recently from Ghana, Africa who went by John Ouno. He is a very loving man who was priviledged once upon a time to raise a woman from the dead. Funerals in Ghana are elaborate and involve many people. It was at a funeral for a young woman (who had been dead for either three or four days by that time) when he felt as if God was telling him to lay his hands on the woman's body (it was an open-casket kind of thing) and pray for her to be raised. He at first, though, decided that it was just his imagination. However, this urging did not go away but intensified until he casually strolled over to the coffin (trying not to be noticed), turned to face away from it and dropped his hand back and touched her hand. At that moment his other hand (involuntarily) shot up in the air and he began shouting out in tongues. Of course everyone stared at him as if he was crazy... until the woman sat up in her coffin! According to him, half the people fainted and the other half ran like hell.

I attended a conference in which a young woman named Bonnie spoke about a time when God comforted her when she really needed comfort. Her baby brother had died when only a few months old. She was devastated, and one night sat on her bed crying and looking at old pictures. She had intense feelings of despair, and was asking God why. Why her brother? She finally asked God to please help her to deal with her brother's death, and to tell him (wherever he was) that she loved him. She put the scrapbook away. Presently the phone rang; when she answered she heard a young boy speak six words.

"I love you too, big sister."

Then she heard the characteristic click of a phone hanging up.

There has been no real stoppage of miracles; those who have never seen them or even spoken to eyewitnesses of them simply haven't looked in the right places. I think the real question is, "Why aren't miraculous occurrances more common?" Why don't they happen in Baptist, Presbyterian, or Lutheran churches as well as charismatic ones?

I see two reasons (there may be more) that God would not manifest His power in a congregation of believers:

There are some Christians who, if they experienced a great outpouring of God's supernatural power, would absolutely freak out and would not be able to deal with it. I think that God protects those people by not destroying them (figuratively) with the reality of His power. Those are the believers that do not ask. either they do not believe that God does these things (and thus surrender His power in their mind), or they believe that the events told of in the scriptures are "special" and not for this period in time.

There are some Christians who genuinely desire for God to pour Himself out on people and anoint them to do the great things promised in the above verses, but they simply lack the love for their fellow man that is needed to back up a supernatural anointing. Their motives are off. They want a light show but only to satisfy some superficial desire.

Mind you, this is not to say that the charismatics and pentecostals are so much more in harmony with God's purposes than, say, Methodists. The more pentecostal Christians are usually more open to the supernatural power of God, tend to more often teach and accept the baptism in the Holy Spirit as separate from the principle of salvation, and (to their detriment) more often seek miracles so much that they actually think of certain things as miraculous when they really aren't (this third phenomenon is often present but not usually prevalent).

There are other reasons why supernatural happenings are not seen so often among believers, but these are the most significant. However, I resist the idea that miracles don't happen anymore, and direct anyone doubting this statement to research the life of John G. Lake.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Why does a loving God allow suffering to continue?

Response by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: Ecclesiastes 4:1-3

Pertinent text #2: Ecclesiastes 7:11-14

Pertinent text #3: Hebrews 12:5-11

Pertinent text #4: John 15:18-21

Pertinent text #5: Job 2:9-10

Pertinent text #6: Matthew 10:40-42

In answering this very difficult question, I wish to treat all people as part of one of two groups: believers in Jesus as Savior and Lord, and everyone else. I feel it is necessary to answer this question in two cases.

Not too many people wonder about the first of these two issues. I will leave the above verses that refer to believers (Hebrews 12 and John 15) to pretty much speak for themselves. We are God's children and we require discipline; also, since Jesus Himself suffered greatly, we believers should not expect to be treated any "better". Indeed, believers should expect hardship and be pleasantly surprised when life is pleasant.

However, the case of people, even little children, dying of starvation in third world countries every day seems to betray the idea that God loves everyone. If he loves us so much, why does he not supernaturally interfere and feed them like he fed Elijah? (see I Kings 19:4-8) Why should that one prophet be so special?

What is really being proposed is a "proof by contradiction" of sorts aimed at suggesting that either God does not exist or God does not really love us. Since God is real, God has great supernatural power, and since God loves all the people of the world, then surely God would use His great supernatural power to provide food for starving people, healing for those with miserable diseases, and clean clothes for the homeless.

I first want to offer to you the perspectives of Job and Solomon. Reading the book of Job will change one's outlook on suffering. After all, Job was a "perfect" man, who feared God (chapter 1). And God simply allowed Satan to take away everything he had, even his family, and give him horrible diseases instead.

When one reads the final five to six chapters of Job, one comes to an understanding that when God speaks to Job about all the mysteries of nature with questions like "Hast thou an arm like God?" (40:9) and "Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?" (40:2), what God is really saying is this:

The book of Ecclesiastes also presents this idea in a clear manner. The extreme nihilism of some parts of that sermon stagger the mind, especially Solomon's statement that in his opinion, those who are dead are better off than the living, and that better yet are the people who have not yet been born into this emptiness we call life. Solomon observes that the wise and the foolish are all the same. They all go to the grave; the lives of both are a "chasing after the wind". (Eccl. 2:12-17)

Ecclesiastes concludes with this statement:

Human suffering is just the same as materialistic happiness: both are emptiness, and pursuing them is "vexation of spirit". Human feelings of pain, hurt, joy, or happiness are completely irrelevant to what is really important: that men follow the commandments of God. And the most important commandment of them all is this:

This has the danger of sounding harsh, but people who deem it important that they maintain a specific "quality of life" have missed the purpose of their existence. Those who are mad at God because God does not take away their pain and suffering are demanding that God serve them. In the most animal sense, we humans are very often self-centered; we want a full stomach and a comfortable life. This is why this question is such a big one for many. Many ask, "Why doesn't God give me what I want? After all, He loves me, right?"

Most people realize that when a child's parents refuse to give him/her something that he wants, it is not implied that the parents are not real or do not love the child. I know a young woman who, when she was sixteen years old, demanded a Lexus from her middle-class parents. She didn't want just any car (which anyone must admit is somewhat normal); she wanted a $40,000+ Lexus. Of course her parents did not give her the car. So she went through the proper proceedings to get a 'divorce' from her parents, and moved back in with her biological mother (who did not give her a Lexus either).

How different from her are those of us who say, "Why doesn't God give me a wife, 2.3 kids, a corporate job and a 401-K? Doesn't God love me? Isn't God real?" Now ask yourself how different it is to gripe at God because you are homeless, and have to beg for money to buy food and a cot at the local Salvation Army. Many homeless wish for nothing more than a steady job. Now ask yourself how different it is to blame God for the fact that you are starving to death.

God is not obligated to give us that which we desire "in the flesh". Rather, God demands that we love Him regardless of our condition in life. Jesus loved the Father perfectly, and so willingly walked into pain and suffering on the cross. Likewise, if we love Him perfectly as Lord, it will not matter to us whether we flourish or starve, whether we are clothed or naked. Our pleasure or suffering becomes irrelevant when we are in love with God.

(notice that in pertinent text #1 both the oppressed and the oppressors were without comfort)

Take note what I am not saying. I am not saying that God sadistically desires to "make all sinners pay." God simply does not give importance to satisfying our desires in a way that has no real significance. By real significance I mean a significance beyond such that the desire satisfied will return in another day, like the desire for food, water, or the curing of the flu. The fundamental desire to be loved unconditionally and to be part of a lasting, loving relationship has real spiritual significance, and God desires to meet that need in people more than we will ever realize.

Part of meeting that need involves meeting other, more superficial needs, such as cooking soup for the homeless, providing medical care for the sick, or (even better) the supernatural healing of a disease. God greatly desires for the hungry to be fed and the sick healed so that this boon can be a means for the ministry of the gospel. After all, what is important is not that the starving children be fed (they will be hungry again tomorrow), but that they be introduced into a loving relationship with God.

Of course, not every starving child is fed. Not everyone is introduced into a loving relationship with God. Why not?

The answer to this is sad and (for me) quite sobering. The answer to this question is that it is my fault as well as the fault of every believer who does not consider it important to spread the love of Jesus throughout the globe. Recall what Jesus told his apostles regarding ministry: "Freely ye have received, freely give." (Matthew 10:8) I do not give; I daily fail in my mission to love the people I encounter. Perhaps if I really cared I would take a homeless man to lunch; perhaps if I really cared I would sponsor a foreign child through a reputable charity organization. And I am not the only Christian who fails in his mission from God.

You see, God gives Christians great authority in the world. We are given the authority to forgive sins. We are to judge the angels on the judgment day. I believe that part of God's gift to us, the Church, the bride of Christ The Anointed One is the responsibility of carrying out God's purposes here on earth. When we fail in that responsibility, it has the effect of God appearing to be distant and uninvolved. In reality, however, it is the Christians who are complacent, sleepy, and uninvolved.

To sum up, God is not interested in fulfilling the superficial desires of people except as a means of fulfilling the more important need of having a loving, eternal relationship with God.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Are there sins which God cannot or will not forgive?

Reponse by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: Psalm 103:8-13

Pertinent text #2: Matthew 12:24-32 (parts)

Pertinent text #3: Mark 3:28-29

Fortunately for the human race, God is a forgiving god! David's psalm quoted above expresses quite beautifully the depth of love and self-restraint that God has toward us. God withholds His wrath by not "rewarding us according to our iniquities"; God has removed our sins from us "as far as the east is from the west"! Certainly, God forgives all kinds of sin.

But Jesus tells us that "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" is never forgiven. Why not? What is this blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? Well, as is not very surprising, this is a debate with a long history. I do not claim to know the correct answer; I will give my educated opinion. I only claim that this is an explanation consistent with the remainder of Biblical teachings.

First, notice that the Greek behind the word "blasphemy" means, literally, "injurous speech". Now since Jesus is talking about "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit", we can conclude that this speech causes injury to the Holy Spirit in some way. Knowing that spoken words and words simply thought by people are the same with God (for God knows our hearts -- I Samuel 17:7), we can conclude that this blasphemy really is something on the inside of us.

Secondly, notice that Jesus includes this statement in a reply to the Pharisees, who accused Him of being possessed with the devil. Jesus had been anointed with the Holy Spirit, and by the power He had in the Holy Spirit, He cast out demons. But these people declared in their hearts (and with words) that the power of the Holy Spirit was of the devil. Jesus used this fact to Illustrate His statement that anyone not definitely for Him is definitely against Him, and then proceeded to this deeper idea.

He said that if people spoke out against Him (believing what they were saying), then it is forgivable. However, because they had seen the power of the Holy Spirit at work and declared it within themselves to be Satanic, they were beyond forgiveness. Why? I believe the reason why is that there is no way to do this without actually choosing to reject what is obvious supernatural evidence of the reality of God. When one rejects God when His power is so obviously demonstrated before them, then they will never be reconciled.

It is not that this is a "special" sin really; it is just that if someone does not choose to enter into a relationship with God after such a display of His reality, he never will. And if a person never chooses to enter into a personal relationship with God, he will be given what he desires; eternal separation from God. Furthermore, if someone at any time enters into a personal relationship with God, we can be certain that at no time did he ever commit blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

Again, I do not claim that this explanation I have given is absolute truth; I have a certain level of doubt about this idea concerning triviality. But I think it is fairly consistent with the remainder of Biblical teachings. At any rate, be assured that God is a very forgiving God, and can forgive even the most vile murderer. He can certainly forgive you.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Where did God come from?

Response by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: John 1:1

Pertinent text #2: II Peter 3:8

Pertinent text #3: Revelation 21:6

In my childhood, I found this question to be quite a riddle. My dad told me that God didn't come from anywhere, but had always "been there". And I remember thinking that, surely, God had to come from somewhere. What I did not realize was the assumption I was making.

To originate means to begin or arise, and origin means a beginning or starting point. So to originate in one's existence seems to imply a flow of time.

The dilemma is resolved through the realization that time itself is part of God's creation. It seems almost self-evident to say that God did not create Himself; nor is God part of His own creation. So God is outside the domain of time, as the verses above suggest (this is how God knows the future). So the concept of origin loses meaning when applied to God.

To sum up, God did not "come from" anywhere because the concept of origin requires the medium of time. God created time, and so God is outside of time (and has authority over it); this is how it can be said that God has always been and always will be.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Why do so many people's prayers go unanswered? Didn't Jesus promise that God would do anything we ask?

Response by: Will Berry

Pertinent text #1: John 14:12-14

Pertinent text #2: John 15:7

Pertinent text #3: John 15:16

Pertinent text #4: John 16:22-27

Pertinent text #5: Genesis 5:2

Here we have four different records of Jesus stating that God will do anything that we ask of him in Jesus' name, no matter what it is. Now, I have seen people pray out loud in church things like, "I pray in Jesus' name that Mr. X be healed from his disease," and the person die. There was a time that I prayed with as much emotional fervency as I could muster for a friend of mine to be healed of seizures. He still has them at the rate of twice a year.

Is Jesus' promise broken? I don't believe that it is. We have from Jesus a conditional statement quite suitable for logical analysis. If we ask God something in Jesus' name, then God will fulfill our request. Therefore, if God did not fulfill our request, we can have confidence that we did not ask Him in Jesus' name. (Of course, this deduction assumes that Jesus' statement is true.) Thus, we can deduce that emotional fervency in prayer is not the same as asking in Jesus' name. We can deduce that simply saying (mentally or aloud) the words, "I pray this in Jesus' name", is not the same as actually praying in Jesus name.

So what does it mean to pray in Jesus' name?

My fiancee's name is Amy. I know her quite intimately, and I have known her for a long time. If someone I did not know were to come up from behind and wrap her arms around me, I would immediately know because of the intimacy of my relationship with Amy. If I had my eyes closed and another woman bent down and kissed me silently, I would immediately know because I know the contour of Amy's lips. I know that her curly hair prevents me from running my fingers through it. I know when she calls, as Confederate Railroad says, "by the way the telephone rings." Indeed, the only things that differentiate us from a typical newlywed couple is a marriage license and the fact that we haven' had sex. But as far as I'm concerned, we're already married.

The union of marriage is described in Genesis 2 with the words, "and they shall be one flesh" (Gen 2:24). We can also note the quoted text above, which states that according to God, the first man and his wife shared a name: Adam. They had one name; they had one identity. That was the depth of their intimacy, and this is not an unimportant detail. The unity of husband and wife is reflected even in American culture by the tradition of a woman taking her husband's last name. Husband and wife are seen collectively as having one name and one identity.

Our relationship with Jesus, The Anointed One, is the same way. Paul said, "he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit" (I Cor. 6:17) in the same way that a man and his wife are one flesh. When we become as intimately joined to the Lord by vehicle of our intense love for and servitude to him (see quoted text #4 above), we are seen as having the same identity in the spirit, the same name. Thus, as we grow closer to and more intimate with God, our very thoughts are thought in His name. This is true in a very real way, and it reveals the difficulty in understanding what Jesus means by asking something in His name.

In case the reader is theologically minded and is questioning this position, I wish to remind the reader of the fact that the 144,000 elect of Revelation had their Father's name sealed on their foreheads. I also wish to remind the reader of that famous verse in Chronicles: "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves and pray, ... then I will ... heal their land."

In summary, what Jesus means by asking something in His name is that we, out of the depth of our intimacy with and love for Him have a close, shared identity with Him, which results in our ability to allow God to perform the acts we both want done and our unwillingness to resist Him. Thus, when we ask in His name, He will do it.

(Top of this page) (Apologetics page)


Last modified: Sep 8, 1997 by Will Berry